» Ethics. Malpractice Statement requirements

Ethics. Malpractice Statement requirements

Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement requirements

The Stated demands

1. Editorial Board

- Journal is the editor and editorial board, whose members are recognized experts in the field of civil aviation. The full names and affiliation of members provided on the journals Web site (http://gosniiga.ru/the-journals-editorial-board.html).

- Journal is contact information for the editorial board on the journals Web site (http://gosniiga.ru/about-the-bulletin.html).

 

2. Authors and Authors responsibilities

- Fees or charges that are required for manuscript processing and/or publishing materials in the journal in 2018 year will clearly stated on the journals Web site before authors begin preparing their manuscript for submission. At the initial stage (until 2018 year) in the journal articles are published free of charge. In the future, the publication fee provided for authors who do not work in the State Research Institute of Civil Aviation.

- Authors are obliged to participate in peer review process.

- All the authors of the articles should make a significant contribution to the investigation, to avoid any form of plagiarism.

- All authors are obliged to provide retractions or corrections of mistakes.

- Authors are required to provide a list of used literature, financial support.

- It is forbidden to publish the same research in more than one journal.

3. Peer-review process

- All of a journals content should be subjected to peer-review.

- Peer-review is defined as obtaining advice on individual manuscripts from reviewers in the thematic area Articles.

- The review process is described on the Web site of the journal (http://gosniiga.ru/the-order-of-review-of-manuscripts-submitted-for-publication-in-the-journal-scientific-bulletin-of-g.html).

- Expert assessments and judgments should be objective.

- Reviewers should not have any conflict of interest with the authors of articles.

- Reviewers should point out relevant research topic published work which is not yet cited by the authors of article.

- Reviewed articles should be treated confidentially.

4. Publication ethics

- Publisher and editorial board shall take reasonable steps to identify and prevent the publication of papers where research misconduct has occurred and the detection of illegal actions of authors of articles.

- In no case shall a journal or its editors will not be encourage such misconduct, or knowingly allow such misconduct to take place. Journal or editors should avoid breaches of publication ethics.

- In the event that a journals publisher or editors are made aware of any allegation of research misconduct the publisher or editor shall deal with allegations appropriately. If the publisher or editors were aware of any cases of unlawful research publisher or revision of the results should consider them properly.

- The journal has a guidelines for retraction or correction articles when needed. They set out on the Web site of the journal ( http://gosniiga.ru/requirements-and-conditions-predstavlenie-for-publication-in-the-scientific-journal-of-gosnii-ga.html).

- Publisher and editors should always be willing to publish corrections, clarifications, retractions and apologies when needed.

5. Copyright and Access

- The author is a man, to a large extent involved in the study and preparation of the article. An article in the magazine under the name of the author is the emergence of copyright. Unacceptable publication of the article without the consent of the author, as well as the introduction of unauthorized persons in the number of co-sponsors, which is a violation of copyright. It is mandatory the consent of all the authors for publication. On the magazine's website, see form, on which the authors agree to publication of the article (http://gosniiga.ru/requirements-and-conditions-predstavlenie-for-publication-in-the-scientific-journal-of-gosnii-ga.html).

- Publishedjournals and some articles available for readers of the journal Web site (http://gosniiga.ru/the-journal-archive.html). Readers can also subscribe to journals published in accordance with the information provided on the Web site of the journal (http://gosniiga.ru/subscribe.html).

 

6. Archiving

- The log file for an electronic backup is shown on the web site: http://gosniiga.ru/the-journal-archive.html . Maintain access to the content of the archive logs for 10 years on the magazine's Web site, and for an indefinite period in the library Research Institute of Civil Aviation, if the magazine is no longer published.

 

7. Ownership and management

- Iinformation about theownership and management of the journal listed on the Web site: http://www.gosniiga.ru/about-the-bulletin.html.

- The publisher the journaldoes not use organizational names that wouldmisleadpotential authors and editors about the nature of the journal owner.

8. Web site

- TheJournal Web site, including the text that it contains, demonstrates that care has been taken to ensure high ethical and professional standards. Proof of this is the registration of the website as a means of mass media in the Internet network : http://gosniiga.ru/index.php?action_skin_change=yes&skin_name=pagenews-english .

 

9. Publishing schedule

- The journalis published with a quarterly periodicity (per year4 issues). It is set in the contracts with OJSC Agency "Rospechat", for 2017 year - the contract on June 1, 2016 #8864.

 

10. Name of journal

- The name the journalis unique and not be one that is easily confused with another journal or that might mislead potential authors and readers about the Journals origin or association with other journals.

 

Supplement and detailing the stated requirements

1. PUBLICATION ETHICS AND Malpractice Statement

In its activities, the Editorial Board of the journal follow the ethical rules accepted by the international scientific community, based on the Recommendations of the Committee on the Ethics of Scientific Publications (Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)), Guide the Ethics of Scientific Publications (Publishing Ethics Resource Kit) to the publishers Elsevier, the Code of ethics of scientific publications of the Committee on the ethics of scientific publications.

Ethical standards and rules include confidentiality, honesty, competence, objectivity, responsibility, oversight of publications, consideration of possible conflicts of interest, etc.

Compliance with agreed norms and rules of ethical conduct are mandatory for all participants of the process of scientific publishing: author, publisher, editor, editorial Board member, reviewer, reader.

 

Duties of the Editorial office, Chief editor and Editorial board:

- to treat responsibly selection of articles in the magazine, not to allow to the publication the materials which don't have scientific value, not corresponding to a profile of the magazine, contradicting policy of magazine;

- not to allow the materials containing plagiarism, or which are earlier published in other editions to the publication;

- to accept and estimate manuscripts according to their contents, without an ethnic origin, a floor, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, nationality or political views of the author;

- to pass the final decision on publication or refusal in publication taking into account results of reviewing and to bear responsibility for the made decision;

- to observe confidentiality, namely, to open information on the submitted manuscript only to the author, reviewers, consultants of editorial council and the publisher;

- when using in own research of unpublished materials from the manuscript of the author(s) it is obligatory to receive his written permission;

- to keep anonymity of reviewers;

- according to the decision of editorial board to direct article to additional reviewing if her author doesn't agree with opinion of the reviewer;

- to stop possible roguish actions and statements of reviewers;

- to answer immediately the ethical claims concerning the considered manuscripts or the published materials;

- to publish in case of need corrections, specifications, denials and apologies.

 

Reviewer's duties:

- to take personal responsibility for the content and quality of reviews;

- ensure confidentiality of the review;

- to review the manuscript submitted for review as a confidential document and discussion with other persons only with the permission of the chief editor;

- notify the editor-in-chief and refuse to write the review in the event of a conflict of interest in relation to research presented in the paper, or insufficient qualifications for the preparation of the review;

- contact editor-in-chief in case of detection of significant similarities of the considered manuscripts with already published earlier article;

- if the author is unwilling or unable to take into account valid comments and recommendations of the reviewers, the article may be rejected from further consideration;

- use the review slanderous arguments unacceptable;

- it is unacceptable when the reviewer has a personal interest in the consideration of the manuscript and its assessment.

All manuscripts submitted for publication in the journal "Scientific Bulletin of GosNII GA", after receipt in the editorial office undergo two stages of review: initial, carried out by the chief editor of the magazine, and "double blind review" or single-blind reviewed by reviewers of the journal.

Author's duties:

- submit for publication original work, previously unpublished and not submitted for publication in another journal;

- provide lists of sources of all sources of information used in writing the article, respectively, placing these loans in the form of quotations and/or references;

- ensure that all data in article are real and authentic;

- to ensure that all authors have made significant contributions in research and in the author list has no "people";

- interact with the editor to correct errors or seizure of the publication, if the author found significant errors or inaccuracies.

- to prevent abuse of "self-citation";

- to prevent any form of plagiarism;

- to take part in the reviews.

 

2. Malpractice publications statement

The editorial Board of the journal declares about inadmissibility of malpractice publications and about prevention this practice.

The editorial Board seeks to monitor and prevent malpractices publications including

- plagiarism;

- data falsification (forgery of research results, deliberate concealment and/or misrepresentation), etc.;

- incorrect indication of authorship (including co-authors individuals who have not made a significant contribution to the published work, omitting someone, the presentation of the publication without the consent of all persons listed as authors);

- duplicate publication submission of the same material as original in more than one publication;

- deliberate distortion of the characteristics, events, or results of research presented in the publication, with the aim of obtaining financial support or other reasons;

- a conflict of interest in relation to research, the authors of these studies, agencies that Fund these studies.

 

Editorial Board upon suspicion or conviction of the authors, reviewers, editors, and other participants in the publishing process in unfair practices publication can take the following actions:

- emails to authors with an explanation and advice, if it is assumed misunderstanding of ethical principles or procedures, or a warning letter for the future, in more serious cases;

- official notification of the employer of the author, containing comments and evidence identified by the journal;

- refusal from considering manuscripts in which there is a conflict of interest based on competitive, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors or institutions related to the article;

- publication in magazine of duplicate publication or plagiarism, if it's documented notice to the employer of the author;

- the official review of published articles from journal subscribers, readers and indexing organizations (electronic libraries, etc.) in the event of official confirmation of the fact of unfair practices of scientific publications of the authors.

In case of detection of unfair practices on the part of reviewers and Editorial Board members the editorial cooperation of such experts should be discontinued.